BEIJING (Reuters) - Humans are stripping nature at an unprecedented rate and will need two planets' worth of natural resources every year by 2050 on current trends, the WWF conservation group said on Tuesday.
Populations of many species, from fish to mammals, had fallen by about a third from 1970 to 2003 largely because of human threats such as pollution, clearing of forests and overfishing, the group also said in a two-yearly report.
"For more than 20 years we have exceeded the earth's ability to support a consumptive lifestyle that is unsustainable and we cannot afford to continue down this path," WWF Director-General James Leape said, launching the WWF's 2006 Living Planet Report.
"If everyone around the world lived as those in America, we would need five planets to support us," Leape, an American, said in Beijing.
People in the United Arab Emirates were placing most stress per capita on the planet ahead of those in the United States, Finland and Canada, the report said.
Australia was also living well beyond its means.
The average Australian used 6.6 "global" hectares to support their developed lifestyle, ranking behind the United States and Canada, but ahead of the United Kingdom, Russia, China and Japan.
"If the rest of the world led the kind of lifestyles we do here in Australia, we would require three-and-a-half planets to provide the resources we use and to absorb the waste," said Greg Bourne, WWF-Australia chief executive officer.
Everyone would have to change lifestyles -- cutting use of fossil fuels and improving management of everything from farming to fisheries.
"As countries work to improve the well-being of their people, they risk bypassing the goal of sustainability," said Leape, speaking in an energy-efficient building at Beijing's prestigous Tsinghua University.
"It is inevitable that this disconnect will eventually limit the abilities of poor countries to develop and rich countries to maintain their prosperity," he added.
The report said humans' "ecological footprint" -- the demand people place on the natural world -- was 25 percent greater than the planet's annual ability to provide everything from food to energy and recycle all human waste in 2003.
In the previous report, the 2001 overshoot was 21 percent.
"On current projections humanity, will be using two planets' worth of natural resources by 2050 -- if those resources have not run out by then," the latest report said.
"People are turning resources into waste faster than nature can turn waste back into resources."
RISING POPULATION
"Humanity's footprint has more than tripled between 1961 and 2003," it said. Consumption has outpaced a surge in the world's population, to 6.5 billion from 3 billion in 1960. U.N. projections show a surge to 9 billion people around 2050.
It said that the footprint from use of fossil fuels, whose heat-trapping emissions are widely blamed for pushing up world temperatures, was the fastest-growing cause of strain.
Leape said China, home to a fifth of the world's population and whose economy is booming, was making the right move in pledging to reduce its energy consumption by 20 percent over the next five years.
"Much will depend on the decisions made by China, India and other rapidly developing countries," he added.
The WWF report also said that an index tracking 1,300 vetebrate species -- birds, fish, amphibians, reptiles and mammals -- showed that populations had fallen for most by about 30 percent because of factors including a loss of habitats to farms.
Among species most under pressure included the swordfish and the South African Cape vulture. Those bucking the trend included rising populations of the Javan rhinoceros and the northern hairy-nosed wombat in Australia.
Reading this made me smirk, I dunno really why, but when I see reports like this, I always am led back to that verse in Matthew about how the Lord "knows the number of hairs on our heads", "we should not worry about today or tomorrow; about what should we eat, or what we shall wear"; "the Lord will not let a sparrow fall apart from His knowledge, how much more He cares for His own!" (all ever so slightly paraphrased).
I also was thinking, that bit about the decrease in reptiles, the vulture and the swordfish - what does man know about the Lord's plan for His creations? Look at the dinosaurs, for instance. By His hand, He put them on the earth and then He took them away. He causes certain species to die off, for reasons that we cannot explain. If He wants to get rid of the South African Cape Vulture, He may by all means do it (vultures are gross anyway).
And by all this, I am not overriding the fact that we are given the earth to till and dominate - we should, but wisely. Yes, conserve, yes - recycle, yes, do whatever is necessary to preserve our resources. But for Pete's sake, trust that the Father will provide, He is a God of abundance & we are still yet to discover the treasures that He has put in this earth for us.
Sometimes, you just have to laugh :)
3 comments:
This news clip exposes one of the major problems in evolutionary thinking. If you are an evolutionist, the fact that some species are "gone forever, grief, grief" should not be bothersome. After all that is the result of survival of the fittest, and they should be able to adapt (as many species, like the spotted owl up here in the Northwest. That population is adapting.) or face extinction. Today's version of evolutionary theory really needs man to help other species survive. Mankind and all the technology that he has developed (or adapted with) really is needed to help take dominion over the rest of the species. Has anyone ever heard one of the alarmist scientist claim in the same breath that although man does cause some destruction, he also can be the instrument of saving and creating remedies for the problem? The line of argumentation usually is that man is bad, bad, bad, so go protest yada yada yada.
I am so thankful that God loves us fallen men and women individually, that he does redeem us, and that we are infinitely more precious to him than the hairy-nosed wombat.
Thank you Jesus.
preach it sista ;)
Why has religion turned into the haven for the lazy? You turn to God and say it's his job. Don't you realize that we have responsibility too? Your lack of knowledge, common sense, and foresight is abhorrent. I hope we eat you and your children first when all the cows die because there is no grass left because it's been eaten by swarms of locusts that haven't been kept in check by hairy-nosed wombats. Then you'll feel the true wrath of God for leading a consumptive, lazy lifestyle.
Post a Comment